What do you use to maze?

Figured I'd get a feel of how many people use their mouse in cooperation with their keys or just their mouse (or perhaps an alternative method?). Personally, I remap my arrow keys to WASD so it doesn't get uncomfortable (reaching my left hand over hurts). What do you do?

I just use the mouse, because on a Mac you need to hold down a key to right-click.

I suppose I could try to get used to it... Eh, maybe.

Keys + mouse, I play in windowed, mouse scrolling != work.

I actually used to use just mouse...Demo you probably remember that replay.

I just use the mouse, mazing off screen is sometimes fun .

Nitrogen wrote:

I just use the mouse, because on a Mac you need to hold down a key to right-click.

I suppose I could try to get used to it... Eh, maybe.

I hate it how the Mac's have one key. Pisses me off when i use mine.

Why not buy a USB mouse or even better, Apple's MightyMouse?

LOL i use a combanation of mouse arrows and then i end up using arrows more than mouse and its a little off screen play

Soul wrote:

Why not buy a USB mouse or even better, Apple's MightyMouse?

Because Macs fail
I still hate their mice. I will always be a Windows guy =/

Apple might have beat Microsoft if they hadn't tried to sell software and hardware. Microsoft went strictly software ><.

Microsoft went strictly software, which none of which , they actually created. They said this UNDER OATH in a courtroom when sued for copyright infringement I believe.

Bill Gates created the original software I thought? I know he dropped out of college because he was making so much money from selling the software.

He just helped it along. It would have been made eventually, he was just the guy who found the shortcuts.

He bought DOS from IBM or something like that.

He didn't "steal" anything.
He didn't just use other ideas, of course he modified them. He just didn't innovate a lot of them.
He's smart, how can you be that rich and not be smart?

You could be lucky.

Cipherz wrote:

You could be lucky.

Uhm.

Okay... Let's pretend Bill Gates wasn't lucky though. Yeahhh >_>

Elmo wrote:

Cipherz wrote:

You could be lucky.

Uhm.

Okay... Let's pretend Bill Gates wasn't lucky though. Yeahhh >_>

It would be difficult to have 60 billion dollars of luck, especially in fields almost entirely unrelated to luck (like software engineering).

Elmo,

Sure the primary reason for a business to exist is to make money, but: 1) there are legitimate and illegitimate ways of making money, and 2) there are other good reasons for a business to exist besides just to make a profit.

Regarding the first point, in my opinion, making money by stealing someone else’s ideas is not a legitimate basis for a business. In Microsoft’s case, that is essentially what they have done. I would speculate that MsDOS, Word, Excel, Internet Explorer, and Windows would comprise some 90% of Microsoft’s income base over the last twenty years. Yet Microsoft did not really develop ANY of these products! They (of course) would never say that they “stole” these items. I believe that their favorite euphemism is “reverse engineer.”

If you are skeptical of the fact that Microsoft has ‘reverse engineered’ essentially all of their major products, check it out for yourself. For example, as I stated on a prior page, in the extremely important Federal lawsuit of Apple vs Microsoft several years ago, Microsoft officials conceded, under oath, that most of the Windows operating system had been copied from the Mac operating system. If you would like to find out even more, here is relatively brief, but an extraordinarily detailed history of Bill Gates and Microsoft (September 2002), and another.

If you would like to keep arguing, I would be happy to prove my point in even more detail.

Bill Gates may've lied because he didn't want a mess with apple and just let them win the lawsuit... Since he has a large amount of money anyways

Meh. Large ammount of money says nothing. Now, double that order...
Hmmm I might drop charges...